I need to warn you up front – sadly, most systems out there are total junk. Seriously. So be prepared for some honest lottery system reviews… a lot of people aren’t going to like this…
What Is A Lottery System?This is comments page 36. Read the full post here:-
Lottery System & Software Reviews
Hey Lottery Guy,
What systems do you like that are effective or do you recommend for a lottery system that makes sense?
Hey Mark,
There really aren’t many that make any sense at all. It’s basically a choice between the ‘The Good’ and ‘The Middle Ground’ (read the intro bit though). And avoid the long list under ‘The Bad‘.
Just received a circular in the mail promoting “The Gaunt Lottery System”. Another professor ‘Sunja Gaunt’ claims he will help you hit the lottery mother lode with his $137 system. He does have a Ph.D which could mean Piled Higher and Deeper? Any comment on this one?
How about Richard Lustig? He says play the same numbers/don’t change your numbers, anything to this?
No.
More about Richard Lustig here.
More about playing the same numbers here.
Does anyone that comes here have settings for Lotto Effect? Thanks, Cliff.
What about “The Lottery Profiteer”/“FORTUNE-GRABBER” from Hamilton Publishing?
Thanks.
More in a long chain of Hamilton Publishing lottery dross.
Hey Lottery Guy… howdy and Happy 2021. I’m sure this system has been reviewed… but I did not see it on the bad list. Professor T Lottery System. I just received the latest copy in Jan. 25, 2021. The cost is now $80.00 for the program, and $140 with the software added. I did find a review of Professor T dated 2016 that wasn’t good.
I have the “Doctor T” Lottery System and the associated computer Disc. Trust me the program is not worth the proverbial “Dick”, and the computer program does not work properly. Run as far as you can from The Doctor T Lottery Scam!
I think you are a little unfair to the Lotwin software although it is a little overpriced, if you don’t know how to make it ‘last longer’ than a paid for subscription. Personally I think it has a lot of useful features like generating all combinations from a set of numbers and then reducing those combinations so you still have a chance to win a prize (including top prize) without having to spend so much – much like wheeling systems do. Having defended Lotwin I still have to say that Expert Lotto does almost everything that Lotwin does and does those things better AND costs a lot less.
Have you reviewed Lottery Defeated software by ‘Kenneth Leffler’. $197 with 8 week refund window?
Yeah, it’s a new name for what used to be called Lotto Crusher – more here.
Do you have a review of Lotto Logic Pro similar to the one you did on Lottery Looper? Your review made more sense than their user manual.
Bottom line how much have ya won using ANY of these lottery systems discussed here? I did win $14,000 about 10 years ago using Gail Howards Smart Picks!
It would be awesome if a quick trial run showing winnings could prove or disprove a system. But unfortunately that’s just not the case. No system, method, software or whatever (listed here or not) will ever make such a dramatic difference that it could be properly tested on a small scale. You need a lot more data, across a long period of time to prove it to a proper statistical significance from winnings alone. I look a lot deeper than that and dig into exactly what a system does and what’s claimed.
It’s great that you had a nice win while using one of the Gail Howard companies products. But can you attribute that win to the product, or just luck..? Similarly, if I buy 10 quick picks and 1 of them wins something – would that mean quick picks have a better chance of winning… or just that I didn’t have enough data yet to draw a conclusion. Tricky isn’t it. 🙂
The big issue I have with the Gail Howard company though is that they use data in a way that I find misleading. They specifically say how many big winners there have been using their products. But they won’t tell you anything about how many people have not won using their products. If a million people buy loads of quick picks for 30 years and a few of them win the jackpot – does that prove quick picks are better? Or does it actually prove they make no difference at all.