Recommended Lottery Numbers..?

Recommended lotto numbers and how to pick them

Is there such a thing as the best lottery numbers to pick? What numbers are recommended to play?

You’ll find a whole ton of answers to these questions online. And nearly all of those answers are total BS. Usually written by someone who is about to sell you their amazing system for picking those numbers… LOL.

So here’s a reality check, and a big slice of honesty for you.

Nobody has ever (yes, ever) been able to prove they have picked better lottery numbers.

And there’s a really good reason for this.

I’m not going to get into the long explanation here of ‘why’. But the short answer is that even if those recommended numbers are better, there is (and never will be) enough data to prove it. That’s a basic fact.

So I’m not going to argue here on whether you can or cannot gain a small edge using certain methods to choose your numbers. Let’s just say it is entirely possible in theory. But what you can know for a fact is that anyone claiming it for a certainty is either lying or simply does not know what they are talking about.

Oooh controversial, a lottery expert who says you cannot prove that recommended lotto numbers are better. 🙂

So let’s talk about some specific examples, then we’ll get into what you can really do about all this.

Seller of Recommended Lottery Numbers Blocked by Attorney General

Go MissouriA pat on the back goes to the state of Missouri, USA for clamping down on a New York company that sells recommended lottery numbers. These were numbers they claim put you “one step closer to actually winning some money off your state lottery.”

‘Multi-Plays of America Inc.’ will cease doing business in Missouri under a court-approved agreement. Not the first US state to do so either.

Attorney General Jay Nixon had this to say: “The selection of numbers by the Missouri Lottery is a random process, and anyone who tells you they can predict what numbers will come up is purely guessing. You would be just as well off getting numbers from a fortune cookie.”

Nixon also added, “But one thing is for sure: If anyone tries to take money from Missouri consumers by saying otherwise, eventually their luck will run out.”

So why did the courts shut them down? Because they stated as fact that their numbers were better. A ‘fact’ they could not prove.

So take note all you vendors of fake number picking systems. If you can’t prove your claim to be able to pick ‘better’ lottery numbers (and I know you can’t!) it’s time to start worrying if you are under investigation yet too.

Be warned though ‘Multi-Plays of America’ may still be operating in other areas of the US. So don’t waste your money if you live in the US and get a telesales call from them.

Pick Number 38 on the UK Lotto..?

If you read this story in the UK papers, you’d be forgiven for thinking the UK Lotto had just given you the best Christmas present ever!

Because an official report from some really clever mathematicians concluded the number 38 is far more likely to be drawn than any other number.

That does amazing things for your jackpot chances… if it were true of course!

If you dig beneath the headlines though, and apply a little logic, the real ‘non-story’ appears. Two members of the Royal Statistical Society were asked by the UK National Lottery Commission to examine results of the UK Lotto draw.

The report ‘The Randomness Of The National Lottery’ was actually published way back in 2002. It analyzed results from 637 UK Lotto draws up to January 2002.

One of the observed ‘anomalies’ was that the number 38 had been drawn 107 times – 14 times more than the next most-drawn ball. Astounding the casual observer might think. Or potentially perfectly normal I say.

In a truly random draw, odd looking results are perfectly valid and normal. If 38 could NOT have been drawn 107 times out of 637 draws there would truly be something wrong.

Think dice (always makes the numbers easier!). If you threw a dice 5 times and got a 6 every time, would that mean there is something wrong with the dice?

It would be ‘unlikely’ so you probably wouldn’t bet on that result (unless the odds were great!), but it’s perfectly possible.

You’d have a case for suggesting there could be something wrong with the dice. But just because an unlikely result happened does NOT prove that theory! Same deal with the UK Lotto.

If you actually look at the recommendation from the report, you’ll see the mathematicians made the same observation. They found a less than likely result, so suggested that the number 38 balls be examined to reassure the public. It’s not clear if an examination of the balls was performed, but to be on the safe side it’s extremely likely!

And a UK Lotto spokesman has now, correctly, confirmed the observation to be consistent with a random draw. But of course, that doesn’t make an interesting newspaper story!

So Is 38 Now a Recommended Lottery Number?

Not any more! And here’s why – now that millions of UK Lotto players have read how 38 is ‘far more likely to be drawn’ (remember: it’s not!). Imagine what will happen when 38 is drawn. Yup, it’s now very likely any jackpot from a combination including the number 38 will be won by a lot more people. All sharing the prize. All disappointed at having won a much smaller jackpot than usual!

Technically there is no reason to believe 38 is any more likely to be drawn in future, whether the ‘anomaly’ was investigated or not. It’s perfectly possible (only unlikely) that it may not appear at all for another 637 draws! Or it may well be just a little bit more likely. But the fact is we don’t know and will never have enough data to prove it for certain.

Recommended Methods To Pick Numbers (by the Mainstream Media)

Let’s be clear – journalists are not mathematicians. And when they write stories about playing the lottery, they are usually out to entertain rather than inform.

This sadly means that the interweb is (surprise!) full of bad information. 🙂

So you will see even highly respected news sources such as Forbes, CBS or The Telegraph suggesting (or even recommending) the most ridiculous things.

These are just some of the methods I’ve seen news sources recommend:-

  • Pick numbers according to birthdays of relatives or friends (just because a single combination on a test ticket matched 2 numbers!).
  • Buy from certain stores or certain areas because they are ‘lucky’ and have won more prizes.
  • Stick with the same numbers and don’t change them (because Richard Lustig said so!).
  • Picking overdue numbers (without defining what overdue really means, or why that would help).
  • Buy your ticket on a certain day of the week.
  • Move to a particular town because it’s had the most winners.

Just to be really clear – all of these methods are totally bogus. So please don’t think they will help or spread the bad advice by telling friends and family that these ideas work!

So What Numbers Are Recommended? How Can You Get Better Numbers?

The short slightly painful truth is – you can’t. Not for certain.

But that’s not the end of the story. Lottery odds are tough (for any game worth winning), so any strategy that either genuinely or potentially gives you an edge is worth using. You apply all of those and your odds of being a big winner can get significantly better overall. No guarantees, no ‘beating the system’, no insider hidden shenanigans. Just a sensible better way to play.

If that’s what you are really looking for, then check out my Lottery Strategy Group. It’s not for everyone. You will need to put a little effort in. This is not silly push button magic. And bear in mind the only thing I guarantee is that I won’t be teaching you any of the silliness you see everywhere else. 🙂

5 Comments so far ↓

  • Don Chezik

    I’m ready to move on beyond the phony lottery strategies and find an explanation for these testimonials of people who claim to have won several lotteries using Gail Howard’s “Smart Luck” systems. Also there is the recent report of this guy who has won 4 Powerball jackpots and a string of other lotteries. He is reputed to be a millionaire. I couldn’t find anything that showed he was a fraud. Richard Lustig, a seven-time lottery winner in Florida whose winnings have totaled more than $1 million, hasn’t let the slim odds stop him. He shared tips for buying tickets on Tuesday with ABC’s… something. And there are others.

    • LG

      Hi Don

      You have to be careful with these stories, and sometimes read between the lines.

      Take the Gail Howard company. They list testimonials of big lottery winners, plenty of them too (106 last I looked). And I don’t doubt that they are genuine either.

      But is this the real ‘big picture’ story..? Not a bit of it!

      They have been knocking out systems for 30 years, on TV (heavily sold using informercials back in the day), mail order, on Amazon, their own site etc. You can only guess at how many people have bought their systems in that time (100’s of thousands?). And been using them for up to 30 years! (You won’t find that answer on their website…)

      When you look at it that way, it’s actually appalling how few of those people have actually won. If the software and books really work as they claim, why haven’t they worked for 99.9% of their customers?

      In fact, doesn’t that sound more like pure random luck..? (If that many people had simply been buying quick picks for 30 years, how many winners would you expect to see?)

      Richard Lustig is a similar case. Again I don’t doubt his wins – but he’s not telling you the full story, not even in his book.

      Out of those 7 ‘major’ prizes, only 1 of them is what most of us would really consider a major prize (~$842,000 before tax). And that was 10 years ago. His first of those 7 wins is reported as being in 1993. Apparently he plays every day, but he doesn’t tell us how much he has spent on tickets, which does seem quite an important point to miss out. But apart from all that, some of his advice is simply fundamentally incorrect.

      I remember watching Richard tell Cynthia Stafford on a TV morning show how she should never play quick picks. Well, the $2 quick pick ticket she bought won $112 Million. So who was the expert there then…

      At the end of the day, the lottery will always be about luck – otherwise it wouldn’t be a fair and legal lottery. You can maximise your chances using good lottery strategy, but beyond that it really is down to Lady Luck.

      But never trust a system seller who doesn’t tell you the full story.

  • Dirk Smit

    Forget systems. Ignore tips. Lotteries are all chance, and the odds are crazy. I do quick picks. If I want to improve my odds, I buy multiple quick picks. Improve your chances – not your system!

    • Lottery Guy

      Yes, definitely improve your chances. Or better yet, maximise your chances (using good Strategy). Most players completey miss all the important big picture stuff and obsess about magic ways to pick numbers. When you can do so much better.

  • The Bern

    I have been dabbling for 4 yrs now, trying to truly discover a system that has not yet been discovered, and to no avail. I have created so many historical number spreadsheets, upwards of 30, and at times they have been fruitful enough to reach what I would call “small break even” status. I have gone through the Delta phase, and the Winslips phase.

    I am refreshed by your fresh honest and knowledgeable outlook on the task of becoming a lotto winner. I am that point where I think “if they can fix dice, they can fix lottery balls” for certain outcomes. with all this said, I like your mails, and agree with what you preach. Count me in!

Leave a Reply

Subscribe To Comments?

P.S. Did you get my Lottery Tips emails yet?