<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysing Lottery Results Reveals Unusual Pattern&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/</link>
	<description>Revealing the true lottery secrets...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:08:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lottery-Guy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Lottery-Guy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Yes you can see historical patterns in randomness. But any patterns, long or short term, are entirely useless for predicting what comes next. It&#039;s how lottery games are designed, and there simply is no evidence to prove otherwise.

Enjoy learning Excel though. It won&#039;t help you win but spreadsheets are pretty cool - all hail Visicalc that brought the spreadsheet to the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you can see historical patterns in randomness. But any patterns, long or short term, are entirely useless for predicting what comes next. It&#8217;s how lottery games are designed, and there simply is no evidence to prove otherwise.</p>
<p>Enjoy learning Excel though. It won&#8217;t help you win but spreadsheets are pretty cool &#8211; all hail Visicalc that brought the spreadsheet to the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve given what you have said some thought. If the longest running lottery in the world has only 15,000 drawings then I should be looking for the short-term patterns. I understand randomness, but randomness often occurs in clusters. If you look at all the possible combinations that can occur you are applying a long-term analysis to a short-term game which would be my lifetime.

Also, I concede there are no perfect patterns to be found in past lottery drawings but I can&#039;t help but see occurrences, like numbers that repeat the very next drawing or numbers that are dormant and become awake hitting several times once they hit twice within a few drawings.

There is no perfect sure fire way to predict the lottery but I believe there are smarter ways to pick numbers than out of thin air. I can often pick at least one or two numbers that I&#039;m sure are going to hit and they often do. I just need to get lucky on the other four or five. But I only need to get lucky once.

Besides, I&#039;m learning a lot about Microsoft Excel in the process, that alone is worth the time spent investigating patterns and occurrences. To me, it&#039;s fun, maybe one day it will pay off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve given what you have said some thought. If the longest running lottery in the world has only 15,000 drawings then I should be looking for the short-term patterns. I understand randomness, but randomness often occurs in clusters. If you look at all the possible combinations that can occur you are applying a long-term analysis to a short-term game which would be my lifetime.</p>
<p>Also, I concede there are no perfect patterns to be found in past lottery drawings but I can&#8217;t help but see occurrences, like numbers that repeat the very next drawing or numbers that are dormant and become awake hitting several times once they hit twice within a few drawings.</p>
<p>There is no perfect sure fire way to predict the lottery but I believe there are smarter ways to pick numbers than out of thin air. I can often pick at least one or two numbers that I&#8217;m sure are going to hit and they often do. I just need to get lucky on the other four or five. But I only need to get lucky once.</p>
<p>Besides, I&#8217;m learning a lot about Microsoft Excel in the process, that alone is worth the time spent investigating patterns and occurrences. To me, it&#8217;s fun, maybe one day it will pay off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lottery-Guy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Lottery-Guy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-624</guid>
		<description>Consecutive numbers = &quot;pretty pattern&quot;

I agree, it&#039;s never been drawn. But just like millions of other combinations (literally millions) that have never been drawn. You&#039;re not wondering about most of those purely because they don&#039;t make a pattern when you put them in numerical order.

Like I said above, the longest running lottery in the world has only had 15,000 draws. Most have been running a lot less than that.

There are many millions more lottery combinations than there have been draws.

So it&#039;s actually of no surprise, or significance that consecutive numbers have yet to be drawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consecutive numbers = &#8220;pretty pattern&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree, it&#8217;s never been drawn. But just like millions of other combinations (literally millions) that have never been drawn. You&#8217;re not wondering about most of those purely because they don&#8217;t make a pattern when you put them in numerical order.</p>
<p>Like I said above, the longest running lottery in the world has only had 15,000 draws. Most have been running a lot less than that.</p>
<p>There are many millions more lottery combinations than there have been draws.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s actually of no surprise, or significance that consecutive numbers have yet to be drawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>What &#039;pretty pattern&#039; would that be? I&#039;m merely suggesting out of the MILLIONS of drawings that have occurred since the lottery became a concept of man, I nor anyone I know has EVER seen or heard of a consecutive winning combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8216;pretty pattern&#8217; would that be? I&#8217;m merely suggesting out of the MILLIONS of drawings that have occurred since the lottery became a concept of man, I nor anyone I know has EVER seen or heard of a consecutive winning combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lottery-Guy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Lottery-Guy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

What are the odds when you combine all the worlds lotteries of having five consecutive numbers?

Exactly the same as them having any other combination!

The only reason it&#039;s even on your mind is because you&#039;re attaching significance to a &#039;pretty pattern&#039;. There are millions of other combinations that have never been drawn anywhere in the world.

Remember, it&#039;s actually balls that come out of the machine, not numbers - the numbers printed on them just help us decide who won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>What are the odds when you combine all the worlds lotteries of having five consecutive numbers?</p>
<p>Exactly the same as them having any other combination!</p>
<p>The only reason it&#8217;s even on your mind is because you&#8217;re attaching significance to a &#8216;pretty pattern&#8217;. There are millions of other combinations that have never been drawn anywhere in the world.</p>
<p>Remember, it&#8217;s actually balls that come out of the machine, not numbers &#8211; the numbers printed on them just help us decide who won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>I understand what you are saying but every Pick 5 and Pick6 lottery has the numbers 1,2,3,4,5 in addition to 2,3,4,5,6,7 and several more five consecutive combinations. 

I&#039;ve never heard of a 5 consecutive number winning combination.
It&#039;s just interesting that out all the lotteries combined, none, have had this occurrence to my knowledge.

Wonder what the odds are when you combine all the lotteries in the world of having one five consecutive winning combination. 

If you took the lottery with the lowest number of playable numbers and based it on that with the all the drawings to date with every lottery with at least that minimum number of playable numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you are saying but every Pick 5 and Pick6 lottery has the numbers 1,2,3,4,5 in addition to 2,3,4,5,6,7 and several more five consecutive combinations. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of a 5 consecutive number winning combination.<br />
It&#8217;s just interesting that out all the lotteries combined, none, have had this occurrence to my knowledge.</p>
<p>Wonder what the odds are when you combine all the lotteries in the world of having one five consecutive winning combination. </p>
<p>If you took the lottery with the lowest number of playable numbers and based it on that with the all the drawings to date with every lottery with at least that minimum number of playable numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lottery-Guy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Lottery-Guy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,

The longest running lottery in the world has had less than 15,000 draws. Most have had less than a couple of thousand draws. And there are nearly 14 MILLION combinations in a 6 from 49 lottery. 

So it&#039;s actually no surprise at all at this stage that there are combinations that have never been drawn anywhere in the world.

In fact, there will be millions of them!

Of course the newspaper headlines will explode with how amazing, astounding and incredibly improbable it is when 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is drawn somewhere... But they won&#039;t when 6, 23, 27, 34,  35, 37 is drawn for the first time anywhere in the world...

The only difference is the lack of what our brains recognise as a pretty pattern..!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p>
<p>The longest running lottery in the world has had less than 15,000 draws. Most have had less than a couple of thousand draws. And there are nearly 14 MILLION combinations in a 6 from 49 lottery. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s actually no surprise at all at this stage that there are combinations that have never been drawn anywhere in the world.</p>
<p>In fact, there will be millions of them!</p>
<p>Of course the newspaper headlines will explode with how amazing, astounding and incredibly improbable it is when 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is drawn somewhere&#8230; But they won&#8217;t when 6, 23, 27, 34,  35, 37 is drawn for the first time anywhere in the world&#8230;</p>
<p>The only difference is the lack of what our brains recognise as a pretty pattern..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Just curious, of all the lotteries in the world and the millions of drawings that have occurred over years and years, has any lottery anywhere produced the lowest consecutive result for their game? ex. 1,2,3,4,5 or 1,2,3,4,5,6. 

It would seem that if randomness is truly at play this event would prove it. I realize the astronomical odds but certainly one lottery somewhere it has occurred or has it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, of all the lotteries in the world and the millions of drawings that have occurred over years and years, has any lottery anywhere produced the lowest consecutive result for their game? ex. 1,2,3,4,5 or 1,2,3,4,5,6. </p>
<p>It would seem that if randomness is truly at play this event would prove it. I realize the astronomical odds but certainly one lottery somewhere it has occurred or has it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lottery-Guy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Lottery-Guy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Danny,

Common sense..? Nope, common misunderstanding.

And completely wrong I&#039;m afraid.

You&#039;re placing significance on these combinations because your brain can make a pretty pattern. But the balls don&#039;t know they&#039;re making a pattern - so why would they be less likely to come out that way?!

The fact is there is no such thing as unlikely combinations, in any lottery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,</p>
<p>Common sense..? Nope, common misunderstanding.</p>
<p>And completely wrong I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re placing significance on these combinations because your brain can make a pretty pattern. But the balls don&#8217;t know they&#8217;re making a pattern &#8211; so why would they be less likely to come out that way?!</p>
<p>The fact is there is no such thing as unlikely combinations, in any lottery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lottery-guy.com/lgblog/analysing-lottery-results-reveals-unusual-pattern/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Patterns in randomness aren&#039;t even worth thinking about, the odds on the relationships between the numbers are the only thing I&#039;d worry about.
EG: the likelyhood of all even or odd numbers occuring, or consecutive sequences.

Imagine you were a book keeper; what would your payout be for, effectively a ,&quot;straight&quot; , on winning - 1,2,3,4,5,6 ? Higher than just some lucky dip? Yes

Common sense really</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patterns in randomness aren&#8217;t even worth thinking about, the odds on the relationships between the numbers are the only thing I&#8217;d worry about.<br />
EG: the likelyhood of all even or odd numbers occuring, or consecutive sequences.</p>
<p>Imagine you were a book keeper; what would your payout be for, effectively a ,&#8221;straight&#8221; , on winning &#8211; 1,2,3,4,5,6 ? Higher than just some lucky dip? Yes</p>
<p>Common sense really</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
